In the book, Slow Death by Rubber Duck Rick Smith turns
himself into a human science experiment. He lathers himself with
shampoos and shaving creams, all in the sweetly-scented spirit of
chemical exposure. To phthalates, that is. A type of chemical commonly
found in cosmetics as well as plastic toys and PVC. After three days,
the amount of phthalate byproducts in Smith's blood spikes. One of the
by-products has notably been linked to male reproductive problems.
The issues associated with phthalates (pronouced tha-layts)
are not new and have lead many countries to ban their use in toys. How
hazardous the quantities are in cosmetics however, remains hotly
debated.
But, new studies suggest that phthalates from 'personal-care'
product-use relate to diabetes prevalence, as well as to insulin
resistance.
One
recent study
looked at over 1000 elderly women. While phthalates were detected in
nearly all the participants, high levels of the phthalate metabolites
were associated with an increased prevalence of diabetes, even after
lifestyle and other health factors were taken into consideration.
"There is a connection between phthalates found in cosmetics
and plastics and the risk of developing diabetes among seniors," study
author Monica Lind told
WebMD. "Even at relatively low levels of phthalate metabolites in the blood, the risk of getting diabetes begins to rise."
Similarly,
another study,
just published, analysed the urine samples of 2350 women, aged between
20 and 80. After adjusting for sociodemographic, behavioral and dietary
factors, the researchers found that women with more phthalates in their
urine were more likely to have reported diabetes.
Those with the highest level of certain phthalates in their
urine had double the risk of diabetes of those with the lowest levels.
"This is an important first step in exploring the connection between
phthalates and diabetes," said
study leader Dr Tamarra James-Todd.
"We know that in addition to being present in personal care products,
phthalates also exist in certain types of medical devices and medication
that is used to treat diabetes and this could also explain the higher
level of phthalates in diabetic women. So overall, more research is
needed."
As Dr James-Todd said, because we are exposed to phthalates
in so many forms, it cannot conclusively be linked to cosmetic-use. But,
we do pickle ourselves in the stuff. Considering that the average
woman, and increasingly man, applies
an estimated 200 chemicals to her skin each day, are the results of these studies really any big surprise?
No, says Dr Mariann Lloyd-Smith, Senior Advisor to the
National Toxics Network. "I think it's just another nail in the coffin
of phthalates. It is certainly confirmation of studies that are already
out there," she says. "Consumers are being exposed [because] it's
difficult for the average consumer to understand what's in [the
products] ... We shouldn't still be waiting for action by regulation
moderators."
The moderators she speaks of are NICNAS, the National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme.
While the European Union (EU) and the US have banned DEHP
[diethylhexyl phthalate - a type phthalate] for use in cosmetics,
Australia has not.
In regards to phthalates, NICNAS states that "Currently there
are no restrictions in Australia on the use of DEHP in cosmetics and
there is a potential for introduction and widespread use of cosmetic
products containing DEHP." They do, however
recommend that it be added to the list of substances considered dangerous to human health.
More recently, they have reviewed other forms of phthalates.
"The delegate has decided that body lotion preparations for
human use containing more than 0.5 per cent diethylphthalate or
dimethylphthalate be added to the existing prohibited uses in the
respective Appendix C entries for diethylphthalate and
dimethylphthalate. The delegate also decided an implementation date of
within six months of the delegate's publication of final decisions (i.e.
1 September 2012)."
But, this is still higher than in the US and the EU, where
the concentration of phthalates in many products cannot exceed 0.1 per
cent, Lloyd-Smith says.
"Why is it different in Australia than US or EU?" she
queries. "It has the footprint of an endocrine-disrupting chemical. We
need to take action as soon as possible - and protect the future of
generations to come."
In the meantime, she suggests women, and men, take matters into their own hands by minimizing their exposure through cosmetics.
Her advice
- "Reduce ... the number of products you put on your skin
and in your hair on a daily basis. Lipsticks in particular, as we tend
to eat a lot [of what we put on our lips]."
- Really look at a product before buying it. "Products have
to give full labelling, so avoid all phthalates and seek out toxin-free
cosmetics and shampoos."
- "When you see long scientific-sounding, chemical-based names [it's a red-light]."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.